den Toonder, “ Circulating tumor cells: The grand challenge,” Lab Chip 11, 375– 377 (2011). Toner, “ A microfluidic device for practical label-free CD4+ T cell counting of HIV-infected subjects,” Lab Chip 7, 170– 178 (2007). den Toonder, “ Circulating tumor cell isolation and diagnostics: Toward routine clinical use,” Cancer Res. Ruchirawat, “ Microfluidic approaches to malaria detection,” Acta Tropica 89, 357– 369 (2004). Schwartz, “ Elongation and migration of single DNA molecules in microchannels using oscillatory shear flows,” Lab Chip 9, 2348– 2355 (2009). Prockop, “ Identification of a subpopulation of rapidly self-renewing and multipotential adult stem cells in colonies of human marrow stromal cells,” Proc. Mazzini, “ Isolation of rare circulating tumor cells in cancer patients: Technical aspects and clinical implications,” Expert Rev. Finally, we discuss the future research areas for extending the scope of hydrodynamic mechanisms and exploring new physical directions for microfluidic applications. We also highlight the advantages and drawbacks of each method in terms of throughput, separation efficiency, and cell viability. Our emphasis is on the underlying fluid dynamical mechanisms causing cross stream migration of objects in shear and vortical flows. Here, we present an overview of the cell/particle sorting techniques by harnessing intrinsic hydrodynamic effects in microchannels. Due to inherent problems of isolation methods based on the biomarkers and antigens, separation approaches exploiting physical characteristics of cells of interest, such as size, deformability, and electric and magnetic properties, have gained currency in many medical assays. These processes are largely beneficial in biomedical applications and fundamental studies of cell biology as they provide cost-effective and point-of-care miniaturized diagnostic devices and rare cell enrichment techniques. Focusing and sorting cells and particles utilizing microfluidic phenomena have been flourishing areas of development in recent years.